Canada's private real estate funds are freezing up. About $30 billion is locked and investors are learning what illiquid really means.

There is a phrase that gets thrown around a lot in private fund marketing: monthly liquidity. It sounds reassuring. It implies that your money isn't locked up the way it would be in a direct property purchase. You can get out if you need to. Monthly. Clean. Simple.

Except when you can't.

‍

That is the situation playing out right now across Canada's private real estate sector. About $30 billion, nearly 40 percent of all capital invested in Canadian private real estate funds, is currently locked up as managers restrict redemptions, halt distributions, or put investors on waiting lists. The gating wave has touched some of the biggest names in the space: Romspen, Nicola Wealth, Hazelview, Trez Capital, Centurion Apartment REIT, and KingSett Capital's real estate income fund, among others.

The latest and most significant entry into that list is Avenue Living Asset Management, a Calgary-based firm with roughly $9.8 billion in assets under management spanning over 50 markets in Canada and the United States. On March 2, 2026, Avenue Living announced that the boards of its two flagship vehicles, the Avenue Living Real Estate Core Trust and Mini Mall Storage Properties Trust, have initiated strategic reviews to evaluate a possible go-public transaction. Effective March 31, redemptions are frozen for up to six months. New equity subscriptions are also paused.

‍

Two Big Funds, One Strategic Pivot

The Core Trust is primarily an apartment fund, focused on residential properties across Western Canada. It held over 23,000 rental units as of its last reported figures, and completed $1.1 billion in acquisitions totalling 4,697 residential units in the past year alone. Mini Mall Storage Properties Trust, the other fund involved, is a self-storage platform with nearly 13 million square feet of space, after completing $887 million in acquisitions last year.

On paper, both funds look healthy. The Core Trust reported 94.1 percent occupancy and a 70.7 percent NOI margin as of December 31, 2025. The Mini Mall trust reported 89.7 percent occupancy, a 74.2 percent NOI margin, and 6 percent same-door NOI growth. Both carry investment-grade debt ratings, and together the group raised $2.4 billion in senior unsecured debentures in the past 12 months.

So this isn't a story of a failing fund. Avenue Living isn't in distress in the traditional sense. Monthly distributions will continue. Net asset value will still be calculated monthly. The firm has been explicit that all redemptions payable through February 27, 2026 were honoured in full and on time.

What this is, though, is a recognition that the private fund structure has structural limits, and that those limits tend to become visible exactly when investors want out.

‍

The Structural Problem That Was Always There

Former Bank of England governor Mark Carney put it plainly in 2019: funds offering regular redemptions while holding illiquid assets are "built on a lie." That is a strong statement, and it was largely ignored during the low-rate years when property values kept climbing and redemption requests were rare.

The logic of these vehicles was never really about liquidity. It was about access. Private real estate funds allowed regular investors and institutions to participate in large-scale property portfolios without buying buildings outright. The monthly or quarterly redemption windows were a feature, not a core promise. The underlying assets, apartment buildings and storage facilities, don't liquidate on demand. Selling a portfolio of 4,700 residential units isn't a same-week transaction.

For years, this mismatch didn't matter much. Inflows from new investors kept the redemption queue manageable. Property values were rising, so exiting investors were happy anyway. The whole system worked, until rates rose, values softened, and a few larger investors started asking for meaningful redemptions at once.

That is what appears to have happened with Avenue Living's sibling firm, Invico Capital Corp., which acts as fund manager for both trusts. Invico, which manages about $4 billion in assets, adopted a structured liquidity management plan for its Invico Diversified Income Fund after large investors submitted redemption requests. The firm reached out to certain investors to understand their needs and put a plan in place to manage withdrawals without destroying net asset value.

It's a reasonable response. It's also a clear signal that the queue was larger than routine operations could absorb.

‍

Why "Going Public" Makes Sense Right Now

Avenue Living's management has recommended that both trusts pursue a go-public transaction, likely as REITs on the Toronto Stock Exchange. If that happens, it would match the total number of TSX IPOs done in all of 2025, a year when Canadian public markets were notably quiet while U.S. IPO activity surged 54 percent.

The logic is straightforward. A publicly traded REIT gives investors an actual exit mechanism: you sell your units on the open market whenever you want. There is no redemption queue, no six-month review window, no dependence on the fund manager's cash position. The market sets the price in real time, and buyers and sellers transact directly.

That doesn't mean public markets are always better. REITs trade at discounts to NAV regularly, especially in high-rate environments. Publicly traded vehicles come with quarterly reporting obligations, analyst coverage, and shareholder scrutiny that private funds don't face. Avenue Living's founders, Anthony Giuffre and Jason Jogia, built their platform outside public markets deliberately over 20 years. Going public is a meaningful structural change.

But the alternative, keeping a $9.8 billion fund private while redemption demand builds and investor confidence erodes, is worse. Co-founder and CIO Jason Jogia said the move is about evolving to a structure that "enhances liquidity, maintains best-in-class governance and disclosures, and demonstrates a commitment to continued strategic growth." Reading between the lines: the private structure served them well for two decades, and now the market is telling them it's time to mature.

‍

What This Means for Investors in Private Real Estate

If you are currently holding units in any Canadian private real estate fund, the Avenue Living situation is worth paying close attention to, not because of what it says about Avenue Living specifically, but because of what it reveals about the asset class as a whole.

Private real estate funds are illiquid by nature. The buildings they own are illiquid. The financing arrangements are long-term. The operational value creation, renovations, lease-up, NOI improvement, takes years to play out. Packaging that into a vehicle with monthly redemption windows was always a convenience feature, not a structural truth.

In Canada, the problem is concentrated. With roughly $80 billion invested in private real estate funds nationally, the $30 billion in locked capital represents a substantial portion of the sector. Higher interest rates have compressed property values and tightened operating margins. Investors who entered during the low-rate boom and are now reviewing their portfolios are finding the exit door narrower than the marketing materials suggested.

For investors considering entry into private real estate funds today, a few things are worth asking upfront. What is the fund's actual redemption history over the past two years? Has the fund ever gated redemptions or activated a liquidity management plan? What percentage of the fund's assets are unencumbered? And critically: what happens if you need your money back in 12 months?

The answers to those questions matter more right now than any occupancy figure or NOI margin.

‍

The Broader Picture

None of this is unique to Canada. The same liquidity stress played out in U.S. private real estate funds, most visibly with Blackstone's BREIT vehicle, which gated redemptions in late 2022 and managed through the pressure over the following 18 months. The mechanics are identical: illiquid assets, liquid-feeling redemption windows, and a market environment that suddenly made those windows feel very small.

What's happening with Avenue Living is arguably the healthier version of this story. The fund is performing well operationally, has strong debt ratings, and management is proposing a genuine structural solution rather than kicking the can. Going public, if it happens, actually resolves the liquidity mismatch rather than just deferring it.

But it's still a gate. And for investors who assumed monthly liquidity meant monthly liquidity, six months is a long time.

Real estate has always been illiquid. The structures built around it in the private fund world attempted to paper over that reality. When markets are calm, that works. When they're not, the paper starts to show its seams.

‍

Have questions about how private real estate vehicles compare to direct property ownership or publicly traded REITs? The team at Coldwell Banker Horizon Realty works with investors across the Okanagan and BC Interior, and we can help you think through what makes sense for your situation.